The plaintiffs’ complaint cited California’s Unfair Competition Law and Insurance Code section 1861.05(a), which states that “no rate shall be approved or remain in effect which is excessive, inadequate, unfairly discriminatory or otherwise in violation of this chapter.” They argued that CSAA’s failure to refund more of the premiums violated this provision, especially since the company had already issued partial refunds – 20% for March and April 2020, and 10% for May and June 2020 – following bulletins from the insurance commissioner. However, the plaintiffs maintained these refunds were insufficient, and that the remaining premiums were still excessive given the
CSAA dodges pandemic refunds as California court shields insurers’ premiums
- Niki Wilson
Recent Company News
- E-Claim.com Successful Second Round in the Edward Lowe Foundation’s SIG Program
- E-Claim.com Welcomes Lozano Insurance Adjusters: A New Era of Claims Management with ClickClaims
- ClickClaims Recognized as One of the Top Insurtech Companies – Global 5-Star Technology and Software Providers for 2023 by Insurance Business America
- Heartwarming Acts of Kindness Multiply: E-Claim Employee Efforts Result in $9,000 for Smile Train!
- 2021 Louisiana Growth Leaders: Spotlight on E-Claim | Louisiana Economic Development
Recent Blog Posts
- Florida Carriers: Are You Meeting SB-76 Reporting Requirements?
- Thomas Brown, Founder & CEO of E-Claim.com Featured LIVE on Tea Time with Tech Founders Podcast
- Maximizing Every Minute: The Real Game-Changer in Life and Work
- ClickClaims and the Future of AI
- Fighting Fraud from the AIr and in the Courts
Recent Industry News
- US Senator Cruz Proposes AI ‘Sandbox’ to Ease Regulations on Tech Companies
- Judge Skewers $1.5B Anthropic Settlement With Authors in AI Training Case
- CSAA dodges pandemic refunds as California court shields insurers’ premiums
- Homeowners insurance profitability improves despite rising catastrophe losses – Moody’s
- CLARA Analytics Launches Intelligence-as-a-Service for Insurers